snousle: (angel)
[personal profile] snousle
Are consumers aware that the new iphone is NOT a 4G device? This, despite half the Web referring to it as the "4G iPhone"? I only just discovered this and it was a real disappointment, since it moves the phone from "must have" to "why bother". This strikes me as one of the most deceptive marketing moves I've ever seen - it seems like Apple is doing everything it can to further this misconception short of actually lying. Boo, hiss.

[Updated:

The second-generation iPhone was called the iPhone 3G, the third, the 3GS. The sudden adoption of an already arbitrary "generation" number as the name of the phone is obviously not done without a consciousness of it's relation to fourth-generation networking and a foreknowledge that it would ride on that buzz without delivering the goods. Apple can stare off into space, whistling and saying "what, who me?", but with billions of dollars at stake I find it hard to believe that they weren't aware of this years ago and aren't capitalizing on it now.

So yeah, I think it's a deliberate effort to confuse the buyer. You don't have to "lie" to create a false impression, and marketing departments are masters of plausible deniability.]
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

snousle: (Default)
snousle

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2026 12:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios