Religious Freedom
Feb. 9th, 2012 09:49 amWith this dust-up over Catholic nonprofits being required to pay for their employees' contraception - why has nobody asked the obvious question? Replace "Catholic" with "Jehovah's Witness" and "contraception" with "blood transfusions". Why should JW's be compelled to pay for a practice THEY consider sinful?
no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 08:49 pm (UTC)What distasteful exemptions do you mean?
no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 09:25 pm (UTC)Or how about an employer whose health insurance won't pay for allergy treatments if you're a smoker? Or one that won't pay for breast cancer reconstruction because it was "God's will" that you got cancer?
Religion doesn't belong in politics OR insurance.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 11:16 pm (UTC)Agreed.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 02:32 am (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 08:31 am (UTC)2) While it's true when they were knocking on my door, I stooped down to the 5 year old, smiled, and said: "Wow! Someday you could be like me and ride motorcycles!"
3) It is also true that they NEVER immerse themselves in politics. You will see no anti-gay money for Prop 8 coming from JW's. You will see no preacher telling their flock that they gotta vote Republican or otherwise, they'd go to Hell.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 07:24 pm (UTC)