Effects of blogging
Apr. 22nd, 2009 09:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
snousleI've been thinking about the effects of blogging on the mind. It's not inconsequential. I definitely experience the effect where real-life happenings are dominated accompanied by an internal narrative of what I might write about it. Is this good, bad, or just a different way to frame the same stream of consciousness?
It's not like blogging has displaced real life, I'm not spending TOO much time indoors, and the blogs are decisively secondary to the real world - the purpose of the blog, in my mind, is to make the real world more interesting.
Tyler Cowen wrote a few words I think are spot on, but which seem rather too good to be true:
Blogging makes us more oriented toward an intellectual bottom line, more interested in the directly empirical, more tolerant of human differences, more analytical in the course of daily life, more interested in people who are interesting, and less patient with Continental philosophy.
Can't help but LOL on that last point, it sure got his audience spun up. ;-) The comments and links in his post are worth reading.
The maintenance of my soul is something I take with unusual seriousness; careful avoidance of TV advertising, judicious (but enthusiastic) use of drugs, following up on all curiosities with the miracle of Internet research. It's hard to separate the effects of blogging from all these other habits but since it's the biggest single time sink it is subject to unusual skepticism.
I can certainly say that my life is richer and more interesting than it was ten years ago. Even the smallest experiences evoke rafts of association and knowledge. Seemingly inconsequential things are saturated with wonder and pleasure. Did the blogging help make this happen? I like the results but remain uncertain about the process.
Maybe these new information technologies are creating a small, elite class of super-intellects with a historically unprecedented relationship to knowledge. Wouldn't that be interesting.
It's not like blogging has displaced real life, I'm not spending TOO much time indoors, and the blogs are decisively secondary to the real world - the purpose of the blog, in my mind, is to make the real world more interesting.
Tyler Cowen wrote a few words I think are spot on, but which seem rather too good to be true:
Blogging makes us more oriented toward an intellectual bottom line, more interested in the directly empirical, more tolerant of human differences, more analytical in the course of daily life, more interested in people who are interesting, and less patient with Continental philosophy.
Can't help but LOL on that last point, it sure got his audience spun up. ;-) The comments and links in his post are worth reading.
The maintenance of my soul is something I take with unusual seriousness; careful avoidance of TV advertising, judicious (but enthusiastic) use of drugs, following up on all curiosities with the miracle of Internet research. It's hard to separate the effects of blogging from all these other habits but since it's the biggest single time sink it is subject to unusual skepticism.
I can certainly say that my life is richer and more interesting than it was ten years ago. Even the smallest experiences evoke rafts of association and knowledge. Seemingly inconsequential things are saturated with wonder and pleasure. Did the blogging help make this happen? I like the results but remain uncertain about the process.
Maybe these new information technologies are creating a small, elite class of super-intellects with a historically unprecedented relationship to knowledge. Wouldn't that be interesting.
