snousle: (churchlady)
[personal profile] snousle
I'm not much of a software bigot, but if I could banish Excel from the sciences entirely, I would!

There is a family of genes with names like Mar1, Mar2... and another named Sept1, Sept2... et cetra. Try type or paste those into Excel and it TURNS THEM INTO FREAKING DATES!!! As a result, the scientific literature is now full of references to genes called 1-Mar, 2-Mar, et cetra. These are not recognized names that anyone would use deliberately, but a Google search shows the literature to be full of them.

Try to find genes in common between two lists - say, something from a scientific paper and something in your own database - and these ones very often drop out because this involuntary name change corrupted one or the other. Since these lists are often tens of thousands of names long, you never even notice. GAH!

This is just one of many, many ways in which using Excel has silently compromised scientific datasets. It is evil and must die.

Date: 2010-07-02 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barbarian-rat.livejournal.com
I've had the same problem with Excel.
Why can't they make the date logarithm an option you can choose or not for any specific column?

Date: 2010-07-02 04:30 am (UTC)
ext_173199: (CyberBear)
From: [identity profile] furr-a-bruin.livejournal.com
Simple - format the cells you'll be putting that kind of thing into as "Text" (or some other appropriate format, if applicable) before you start typing or pasting. Spreadsheets have an understandable inherent bias toward numbers and dates the way word processors do towards writing.

Date: 2010-07-03 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barbarian-rat.livejournal.com
Thanks, I'll check that out.

Profile

snousle: (Default)
snousle

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 10:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios