snousle: (Default)
[personal profile] snousle
I've been keeping a very close watch on energy use lately. PG+E has a sharply progressive price structure, so while our first kilowatt-hour we buy each month costs only 11 cents, the last one costs 30 cents. That's really quite a bit. Most of what we use is in this 30-cent tier.

Yesterday was a very hot day, and we used 55 KWH of electricity, about $16 worth. That's with five refrigeration units - an undercounter fridge and wine cooler in the residential kitchen, and a commercial fridge, chest freezer, and ice machine in the commercial kitchen. We also made modest use of the air conditioner, which uses 6 KW and therefore costs about $2/hr when it's blowing. So this is not quite the worst case scenario, but it's close.

Averaging over the past three months (in which one month we didn't have the commercial kitchen installed) and projecting forward has us using about 9200 KWH per year. This is just a bit over the average use of a Sacramento customer in 1999 (PDF document) but as much as 50% more than people using other utility companies. This number had initially freaked me out a bit - that's a steady kilowatt, on average - but if we have all this commercial stuff running and still come in somewhere near the average, that's actually doing pretty well.

Today, I turned off the ice machine and put the ice in the chest freezer, which is nearly empty. It's been running almost all the time, so I'm suspecting it's a major energy hog.

My current estimate for our principal fixed costs looks like this:

Propane: $1500 (maybe less with a wood stove)
Electricty: $2500
Gasoline: $5000 (2 cars, 2 motorcycles, 3 people, ~30000 miles/yr total)
Registration, insurance, maintenance: $5000
Road association fees: $2000
Grocery: $8000 (includes wine and liquor)
Property taxes: $7000
Mortgage: $0 (yeah, I like this number a lot!)

A doubling of current energy prices would make things a bit tight. I'd been worried about how this would affect us living up a mountain and all, but in fact the cost of getting up and down the hill has more to do with road and vehicle maintenance than with gas - cars don't last as long here as they do in the city. The American lifestyle really uses a LOT of power, and in the long term there are a lot of ways to cut back, but in the short term it isn't so easy to do.

The one cost that really galls me is cooling the wine collection. We don't have a proper cellar yet, and while I hate to see it sitting at 80 degrees, I also hate forking out ten dollars a day to keep it at 70. Ideally it should be at 60 but that's just not possible right now. Guess we better start drinking!

Date: 2008-07-12 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snousle.livejournal.com
Got a spare $70K to get me set up? Solar is sorta cost-effective if you amortize it over 30 years and you took advantage of the state subsidy (which has since expired). Wind is almost certainly more expensive than that. Best bet right now might be a supplemental propane generator, but I have enough projects already!

Date: 2008-07-12 03:39 am (UTC)
ext_173199: (Dingbot Prime)
From: [identity profile] furr-a-bruin.livejournal.com
Well - It is possible to build your own wind turbines for much less than it would cost to buy them.

Date: 2008-07-12 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snousle.livejournal.com
Yes, but I don't need to do any calculations to be pretty sure that this is a hobby, rather than a cost-saving measure, for those of us on the grid. To be clear, I'm really not that interested in being "green" or "off grid" just now. I'm interested in controlling expenses!

Date: 2008-07-12 05:54 am (UTC)
ext_173199: (The Brain)
From: [identity profile] furr-a-bruin.livejournal.com
Fine; I was just thinking if there were a relatively inexpensive way to get even an average output of 250W - that's a quarter of your average power draw right there. Maybe better than that in terms of money if that pushes you down out of the top ¢/kwh tier. I certainly wasn't thinking whole-hog "off the grid."

Obviously, reducing demand is the immediate way to reduce cost. That spring water we drank much of at QBT seemed to be pretty cold (when it hadn't been heated up by the sun beating on the hose); I have to wonder if there's some clever (cost effective) way to take advantage of that for summer cooling, even if it only reduces how much you wind up running your A/C.

Date: 2008-07-12 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fingertrouble.livejournal.com
ground water heating/cooling? Passing water through underground pipes can help cool it, could that be used as a cooling system?

And as going green, it's not really about that now, it's more peak oil/oil and gas wars are going to make all carbon based energy expensive as people scrabble for the last bits (maybe not coal), the green is the bonus. If you can afford solar/wind go for it, cos it's going to get worse.

And free energy? Nice price!

Date: 2008-07-12 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] h0gwash.livejournal.com
You could run it through a swamp cooler. I've often wished we had a well to feed ours here. Ours is only effective up to 100 degrees with city water. After that the inherent high humidity produces an unpleasant 'steaming' effect. If you were to turn on the AC then, the AC would have to dehumidify the house before actual cooling could be felt.

Profile

snousle: (Default)
snousle

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 12th, 2026 10:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios