Discouraging
Dec. 19th, 2008 09:29 amUgh, this is a completely horrible development:
Health providers' 'conscience' rule to take effect:
The last-minute Bush administration declaration lets doctors, clinics, receptionists and others refuse to give care they find morally objectionable.
This is especially bad for people in small towns. In several small towns around California, the only hospitals are run by Seventh-Day Adventists, who havesome truly far-out beliefs let's say "a history of curious beliefs" about medical care. I've heard of non-religious doctors getting frozen out, and the nearest non-Adventist care is more than fifty miles away.
The Web is curiously silent about the Adventists' moves, and I can't find much commentary on it beyond allegations of them discouraging abortion. But this eleventh-hour ruling is very disturbing given the domination of rural California health care by a religious group that seems likely to make immediate use of this law.
[Edit: It might be that I should be taking some of the things I hear with a grain of salt, having had limited direct contact with this group.]
Health providers' 'conscience' rule to take effect:
The last-minute Bush administration declaration lets doctors, clinics, receptionists and others refuse to give care they find morally objectionable.
This is especially bad for people in small towns. In several small towns around California, the only hospitals are run by Seventh-Day Adventists, who have
The Web is curiously silent about the Adventists' moves, and I can't find much commentary on it beyond allegations of them discouraging abortion. But this eleventh-hour ruling is very disturbing given the domination of rural California health care by a religious group that seems likely to make immediate use of this law.
[Edit: It might be that I should be taking some of the things I hear with a grain of salt, having had limited direct contact with this group.]
Re: Hospital "takeovers?"
Date: 2008-12-20 11:46 pm (UTC)