snousle: (Default)
[personal profile] snousle
Here it is:



There are many orchids that are nondescript and dumpy, but they do not rise to the level of luscious hideousness that this does. It would make a great corsage for a witch.

I only spent about an hour and took about 200 snaps. There were lots of photographers with REALLY long lenses, though I wasn't one of them. Although the telephoto might have been very interesting to work with, I didn't bring it. I found the crowds somewhat unnerving, and felt like I was always in other people's way, so the photos were all pretty hasty, hit and run things. The color temperature of the ambient light was all over the map, from north-facing windows to dimmed incandescent, and that made for a challenge too. I really gotta start shooting raw format.

I do like the relatively modest and overlooked species. Orchids that look like an explosion in a drag queen's dressing room don't really do it for me. Here's some that both caught my eye and came out with good clarity and color. Sorry, I didn't note any species names.









































Re: eye of the beholder?

Date: 2009-03-10 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snousle.livejournal.com
Third from end? With the orange stripes on the labellum? Strangely enough, that was the one photo I came closest to excluding from this set.

Generally species orchids have latinate names while hybrids have english names. There are a few exceptions, most curiously for hybrids that were originally believed to be species. There's a hybrid registry that in theory traces back every hybrid to its ancestor species, and recreations of the same hybrid share the same name (although they can end up looking wildly different).

Profile

snousle: (Default)
snousle

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 09:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios